RandyB Posted August 19, 2002 Report Share Posted August 19, 2002 I just moved my tape drive and Retrospect Desktop 5.6.132 to a new machine, Dell Dimension 4500. Both machines run Win XP Pro. I made a backup of my boot partition. Because I have only a 2-gig dat drive, I excluded some folders that never change like \I386. This was about 1.4 gigs on the tape. Then I went through setting up disaster recovery. It created a 940 meg ISO file. This is too large for a standard cd-r. From the help files and instructions, it looks like Retrospect should have created a correctly sized ISO file. Any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lv2ski Posted August 20, 2002 Report Share Posted August 20, 2002 What do you have in your ROOT directory...of your main drive? (i.e. what is in C:?) any large files? Do you have Goback Installed on this machine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayoff Posted August 20, 2002 Report Share Posted August 20, 2002 When building the .iso image, Retrosect asks for a i386 folder. Try selecting the i386 folder on the Windows CD rather then the i386 folder on your hard disk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyB Posted August 20, 2002 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2002 My boot partition has an i386 directory, some of my key program files, and some Dell support files. All told it's about 3 gigs used. My backup tape of C: excludes i386 and some other things, and is 1.4 gigs. But why should this matter? What possible reason could there be for Retrospect creating a clearly unusable ISO file? This has to be a bug. In fact, if I hadn't repartitioned my drive when I got the new machine, there would be 10 gigs on C:. I have to assume that many users never repartition and just keep everything on C:. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandyB Posted August 20, 2002 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2002 I have a copy of i386 on C: and E:. I pointed Retrospect to E:. I could point it to the cdrom, and put in the WinXP cdrom, but why should this be necessary or make a difference? If Retrospect is making a non-spec ISO file because it's including i386 from the hard drive, why would it be less likely to make the same error if i386 is on a cdrom? And why no error messages, like: "Your files are too large to fit on a disaster boot cdrom. Do xxx" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.