cferri Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 For Duplication jobs, why does Retrospect not just use the drive letter supplied by the OS to identify removable hard discs? Even when discs are configured to have the same folder structure and use the same drive letter, Retrospect sees them as different. This means that a script cannot backup to a disc other than the one it was created for, making the administration of scripts and backups much more cumbersome than it should be. But it isn't consistent. On some systems (very few) Duplication jobs will use different discs without the destination volume having to be re-asigned. WHY?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.