fredturner Posted October 16, 2013 Report Share Posted October 16, 2013 Has anyone experienced less stability w/ Retrospect 10.5 vs 10.2 and earlier, particularly w/ the Engine itself? I've had to restart it to get it to proceed w/ Proactive scripts, and worse, several times it has stopped responding completely. In these cases, the Console cannot "see" the server, and using launchctl at command line or trying to toggle w/ Sys Prefs fails. I have to force quit the RetroEngine process. Anyone else seeing this or similar? Thx, Fred 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wdroome Posted October 17, 2013 Report Share Posted October 17, 2013 For me, retro 10.2 was dead-on-upgrade -- totally useless. On the other hand, 10.5 works fine. And so far it's been very stable. One improvement I noticed: in 10.5, retroISA finally works properly. Before 10.5, the retroISA process created a steady background load on my hard drive (it read 1-2 megs/sec almost constantly). Furthermore, backups actually took longer when ISA was enabled. As a result, before 10.5. I always disabled ISA. With 10.5 and ISA, backups take 10-20% less time. - Wendy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.