pbartoli Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 The Macs on my ethernet network are by default set up with dynamic DHCP IP addresses. Why after all shouldn't I switch to static IP address? Does this configuration has some disavantage versus DHCP?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maser Posted April 30, 2010 Report Share Posted April 30, 2010 Having run a network... The only real disadvantage to *static* DHCP is if you don't manage the network properly. Imagine you have a subnet with 256 IP addresses (well, less, but...) If you configure static DHCP addresses -- but never recover the addresses when computers drop off the network (think of a situation like a University where grad students come in for a couple of years and then graduate) -- then you'll eventually end up with no more static addresses to assign. Apart from that (and I knew other admins who were awful at managing their static IP assignments) -- I see no reason why you wouldn't assign static IPs all the time for your "regular" clients. Dynamic DHCP works best in a fluid environment where people come and go for short terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.