Jump to content

Retrospect 8.1 crashing constantly (tried to enable grooming)


Recommended Posts

 

I am running the latest version of Restrospect (8.1 build 626) on Mac OS X Server 10.5.8. I had one backup script that was alternating between 2 media sets ( located on separate firewire drives). This script has been running for quite awhile. One media set had 378 backups, the other has 222 backups. Because we were down to 40 GB remaining on Media set A I wanted to enable grooming to make room for future backups.

Every time I made a change to the grooming policy the engine would crash. Since we had made so many backups I thought I would try to keep the last 300 backups (to maximize my data retention) but the settings would never stick on Media set A. So I decide to try the Retrospect defined policy on Media set B - this sent Retrospect into a tailspin of which I cannot seem to recover - the engine now crashes constantly.

 

The last activity I saw before the constant crashing was "Retrieving snapshot" "Restore Completed" which I stopped because I thought it might be restoring data from the old backup. I have seen references in the forums that enabling grooming is causing crashes but no resolution. Any suggestions?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the hint Robin.

I moved the catalogs and have rebuilt them, but I don't have the space to copy the set on the same media. Is it possible to move the data into the groomed set and rebuild the catalog (on the same disk)?

 

I did try a copy media set script on another install and there was a disturbing lack of feedback during the process - I ended up quitting the copy script and just pointed the script to a new groomed backup set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I just found this thread and it has me a little concerned. Earlier today I enabled the option for grooming, under the Options tab of my Media Set, I set it to keep 10 backups. Immediately after setting the option Retrospect started running very slowly, it kept saying it was restoring backup sets. After a while it finished, the engine seems to be running fine now, I don't think anything was actually pruned so I'm not exactly sure what Retrospect was doing.

 

The media set in question has a few months of backups on it, am I likely to have problems when Retrospect runs out of disk space and attempts to actually perform the prune? Can I avoid the problems by setting the set back to No Grooming now (before a prune is run) and waiting for an update?

 

I'd appreciate any feedback, thanks in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you first enable grooming for a set that didn't have it on, it "churns" through the catalog file so it can display all your backups in "Past Backups". This is normal.

 

 

Actual *grooming* won't happen until you either run (almost) out of space in your media set or you run a grooming script.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is what I assumed, my real question now is in regards to the bug mentioned in the first post in this thread. Am I likely to run into problems when it decides to groom because I enabled this option a couple months after creating the storage set? And if so, can I avoid the problem by disabling grooming again before a groom is initially performed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know about that. I attempted this when I saw the bug posted and could never reproduce the issue (turning on grooming after the set contains data)

 

If you didn't *crash* after turning on grooming, then you didn't hose the catalog file.

 

So, in theory, you should be able to groom without issue.

 

 

If you are concerned that you'll crash, I'd do what Robin suggested: Make a new media set with Grooming turned on initially, and "copy media set" from your current set to the new media set.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great, thanks for your answer. It's good to know that this bug does not affect everyone. It looks like the first poster had problems immediately that I did not experience. I just wanted to make sure all my bases were covered. Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...