blm14 Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 (edited) I back up desktops and servers which contain patient data, which means that I am subject to HIPAA regulations. HIPAA stipulates that patient information be encrypted whenever possible and at our institution patient data is required to be retained for 8 years at minimum and forever if possible... This means that my tapes need to be encrypted. I have some servers that I also back up which are free of patient data. On the patient-data-containing machines, when I move things to tape, I use encryption and software compression. For the servers I use hardware compression and no encryption (password access only). The tape drive is a Quantum DLT-S4 superloader3, and we use 800gig/1.6T cartridges. Using software compression and encryption I typically am able to fit a SCANT 800gigs per tape. Using hardware compression and no encryption I usually get about 1.2T per tape. This means that I am using 50% more tapes for the encrypted data, which is costing me a fair bit of money because I cannot re-use my tapes. Is there ANY way to get retrospect to encrypt tape sets while delegating the compression routines to the drive? Or am I stuck having to spend $10,000 on an autoloader which supports hardware encryption as well as compression? Edited July 31, 2009 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhwalker Posted July 31, 2009 Report Share Posted July 31, 2009 The whole point of encryption is to make the encrypted data appear to be white noise. Any patterns in the encrypted data would weaken the encryption and make it easy to break the encryption. As you can see, the required white noise characteristic of encrypted data necessarily prevents compression. You are seeking incompatible goals. The only solution is compression prior to encryption. Seems that you need a drive that can handle that. Get an autoloader, too. You will find that it will change your life. Really. It's the only way to do tape. Russ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blm14 Posted August 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2009 Yeah I have a DLT-S4 superloader3 from quantuum. It's a 16 bay autoloader. I really wish I had a library where each box had multiple drives, but o well. I understand your point about encryption, but I still feel like retrospect should support encryption and compression, eg: as you said compress first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emulator Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 This company's cards are fully compatible with Retrospect. They do encryption and compression at once: http://indranetworks.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emulator Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 They are under $2000 as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.