lexi Posted August 21, 2002 Report Share Posted August 21, 2002 We've recently purchased Retrospect 5.0 and a shiny new VXA-1f drive. After the long delay in getting the drive, I have just gotten the chance to set up the clients and scripts properly and had these run for a few days. I am trying to assess whether these backups will be useful *before* disaster strikes. I did Verify on the backup set, with these results: + Executing Verify at 8/19/2002 12:00 PM To backup set August, 2002… Bad backup set header found (0x66508000 at 36,871,576). 2148 files were not verified. 8/19/2002 8:40:41 PM: 2 execution errors. Remaining: 2148 files, zero KB Completed: 633729 files, 61.5 GB Performance: 169.2 MB/minute Duration: 08:40:32 (02:28:44 idle/loading/preparing) Browsing various documentation, it seems that bad backup set headers are usually associated with unsupported SCSI devices; however, this is a Firewire drive, and I specifically called Retrospect to find out whether the firewire VXA-1f was supported before buying it. So, I'm at a loss as to what could be wrong. Any thoughts? Anyone? A disturbing thing about this is that I'm pretty sure I had the "verify" option on all along as the backup scripts were running, and they never logged any errors having to do with backup set headers. Randomly choosing a few files to restore and inspect did not uncover any problems, but given that it's claiming that .3% of the files are damaged, it's little wonder that I did not run into them randomly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2002 Report Share Posted August 21, 2002 The problem is still essentially the same, regardless of the interface: device, media or communication problems. Instead of trying SCSI troubleshooting, you'll need to follow guidelines for FireWire troubleshooting: http://www.dantz.com/index.php3?SCREEN=kbase&ACTION=KBASE&id=27079 Also, note that your device IS supported! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.