Jump to content

Retrospect not recognizing replacement volume


Recommended Posts

I had a hard drive crash on me. Unreadable sectors. I got a new drive and restored my data via Retrospect to the drive. I named the new drive the same as the drive that crashed. My hope was to continue using the drive as a replacement for the old drive with Retrospect picking up where it left off. However, Retrospect will not recognize this new drive as the old one. My backup scripts are asking for the old drive and will not run. Is there any way to get retrospect to see this replacement drive as the old drive. Otherwise it looks like I will have to start a new backup script and forget my incremental backups for this drive.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retrospect uses the term "progressive" backup

 

It does? Where?

 

20 odd years ago, Dantz put out a trademark/servicemark on the term "IncrementalPLUS" to describe their "Normal" backups. I don't recall "progressive" being a term used anywhere in the Mac product (perhaps it's in the Windows version?).

 

As to the Original Poster's issue, Retrospect does not manage volumes (either physical hard drives/partitions or folders defined as subvolumes) by name; that allows the user to change the name of something without Retrospect loosing track of it.

 

I made a feature request (long, long ago it seems) to have the ability to allow the user to assign a new volume the settings of an old, no-longer-available volume (something like Option+Drag-n-drop the grey volume icon onto another available volume icon, the cursor displays a "+" badge, a dialog is displayed "Are you sure you want to copy the settings from OldVolumeFoo to NewVolumeBar"), but I'm doubtful if anyone there remembers that.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retrospect uses the term "progressive" backup

 

It does? Where?

Here:

http://www.dantz.com/docs/techbrief_progressive_bu.pdf

I can't find anything in that document that limits the use to the Windows version of Retrospect.

 

Oh, I found a better one, a description of version 6.1 for Mac:

http://www.emcinsignia.com/assets/ds_mac61bus_en.pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This 2001 press release:

 

http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/software-services-applications-computer/6180751-1.html

 

states:

 

"Retrospect Backup employs progressive backups, known as IncrementalPLUS, a new-and-changed-files method of backup that provides increased efficiency and precise restores."

 

 

Looks as if they use/used the two terms interchangeably.

 

My bad.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...