danwoodward Posted December 27, 2007 Report Share Posted December 27, 2007 I seem to have developed a problem with open file backup. I am using Multi Server version 6.5.382 with open file backup to back up a XP Pro SP2 box (where Retrospect is installed) and several laptops on the network, all of which have the Retrospect client installed. Retrospect is running with admin privileges. I recently added a Vista Home Premium laptop to the network, installed the client, and promptly started getting errors on the first backup. Error message reads: Can't use Open File Backup option for xxx on yyy, error -1017 (insufficient permissions) This error precipitates others due to the fact that Retrospect is unable to use the open file backup option, like: File "xxx": can't read, error -1020 (sharing violation) I have checked both the XP box and the Vista laptop to ensure that the Shadow copy service is set to “automatic” and that there were/are no errors starting the service. Still getting the errors… any ideas? What am I missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHnee Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 1017: http://kb.dantz.com/article.asp?article=9631&p=2 1020: http://kb.dantz.com/article.asp?article=6388&p=2 Oh, and for backing up Vista clients, you'll need to upgrade to v7.5! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
typhoon43 Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 We are running into this error on all of our 64-Bit Windows 2003 Servers in VMWARE. I have tried every Microsoft patch and registry change on the planet it seems. Still no help. What bugs me is that I don;t believe VMWARE is the issue, as our 32-bit images backup just fine. Still scratching my head over this. Anyone actually fixed this yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
typhoon43 Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 **WORKAROUND FOUND** This worked on our "NewSidded" 64-bit ESX boxes. It tunrs out that when you run "NewSID" or any other SID generator on 64-bit images, it hoses VSS. This is how we fixed it, and we are now backing up all of our 64-bit VMWARE servers. Good luck! Be SURE to check the directory paths. That was our problem the whole time. We kept registering the system32 folder dlls. ********************************* 1. Stop the Microsoft Shadow Copy Provider & Volume Shadow Copy Service 2. Export the contents of the HKLM\Software\Microsoft\EventSystem key to a .reg file (as a backup). 3. Delete the HKLM\Software\Microsoft\EventSystem\{26c409cc-ae86-11d1-b616-00805fc79216}\Subscriptions key. (Just delete the Subscriptions subkey; leave the EventClasses key.) 4. Restart the server. 5. Run the "VSSADMIN LIST WRITERS" command. This causes the VSS entries in the HKLM\Software\Microsoft\EventSystem\{26c409cc-ae86-11d1-b616-00805fc79216}\Subscriptions key to be rebuilt when the writers initialize. If that does not resolve it try this: Check the Registry - HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{FAF53CC4-BD73-4E36-83F1-2B23F46E513E}\InProcServer32 - check right pane for (Default) - ensure this is pointing to the correct location à %systemroot%\system32\ES.DLL Try launching each of these consoles: - perfmon /wmi - msinfo32 - wmimgmt.msc If the above works out without any issues, please run these commands on the server: Net stop vss Net stop swprv regsvr32.exe /i %windir%\system32\eventcls.dll regsvr32.exe /i %windir%\system32\swprv.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\system32\vssui.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\vss_ps.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\msxml.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\msxml2.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\msxml3.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\msxml4.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\ole32.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\oleaut32.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\es.dll regsvr32.exe %windir%\SysWOW64\comsvcs.dll vssvc /register net start swprv net start vss ********************************************** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.