Jump to content

6.1.138 - OS X Leopard - 'The limit is 2.0 G'


Recommended Posts

I've searched the forums for instances of Leopard users and a '2.0 G' backup set limit.

 

I'm on an intel mac mini, and the clients are all intel iMacs running client version 6.1.130.

 

Is there a way around this? Do I have to uninstall and go to an earlier version?

 

I don't have the exact error handy, but it's roughly this:

 

'The backup set can not fit that much data.

 

The limit is 2.0 G'

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a setup that has been working for many years - so the drives are all formatted for Mac OS Extended (Journaled)

 

The backup drive is on an external firewire drive.

 

The backup set is a 'File'.

 

None of my Retrospect settings changed in terms of the backup sets, schedules, or media. Since I upgraded to Leopard I thought upgrading both the software (and clients) was the best course of action.

 

(Since this has been working for 3 years, should any of this matter?)

 

I confess I don't know what RDU means. The retrospect version is 6.1.138 and the clients are all 6.1.130 - updated within the past 2 days.

 

Let me know if you need any more info. Thanks for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

I confess I don't know what RDU means

 


 

RDU stands for Retrospect Driver Update. It's a file named "Retrospect 6.1 Driver Update" that lives in the same folder as Retrospect.

 

You can get the version number of the file with a simple Command+I, or you can look in Retrospect's Operations Log for the version number listed each and every time Retrospect is launched.

 

You might want to compare the RDU version of your last working backup against your first failed backup.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK - I downloaded RDU 6.2.12.101. Previously I had no RDU files in my retrospect folder.

 

I get the same error: the relevant portion of the log is below:

 

∆ Retrospect version 6.1.138

launched at 12/10/2007 7:19 AM

+ Retrospect Driver Update, version 6.1.12.101

 

+ Normal backup using Paul iMac at 12/10/2007 7:20 AM

To backup set Paul-iMac…

 

- 12/10/2007 7:20:02 AM: Copying Users on Paul…

12/10/2007 7:20:02 AM: Connected to Paul

Can't add that much data to backup set.

The limit is 2.0 G.

12/10/2007 7:26:15 AM: Execution incomplete.

Remaining: 312924 files, 59.0 GB

Completed: 0 files, zero KB

Performance: 0.0 MB/minute

Duration: 00:06:13 (00:06:04 idle/loading/preparing)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I indicated post #104484 that it is Mac OS Extended (Journaled). The drive has been Mac formatted for a few years - it was never NTFS or any other format.

 

Note: I should also add that I never recall installing any RDU in the past - this seems to be a first for me. Should I considering digging up an old RDU version? (not sure how helpful that will be if I didn't have any installed RDU files to begin with)

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it helps, this appears to be the last successful backup from mid-November:

 

+ Normal backup using mini at 11/17/2007 3:14 PM

To backup set mini…

 

- 11/17/2007 3:14:52 PM: Copying Macintosh HD…

11/17/2007 4:02:33 PM: Comparing Macintosh HD…

11/17/2007 4:02:35 PM: Execution completed successfully.

Completed: 49 files, 9.9 MB

Performance: 17.0 MB/minute (8.7 copy, 294.1 compare)

Duration: 00:47:43 (00:46:34 idle/loading/preparing)

 

Quit at 11/17/2007 4:02 PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

If it helps, this appears to be the last successful backup from mid-November:

 


 

It would help more to see up-log a bit where Retrospect launches, to confirm the version (or absence entirely) of an RDU file.

 

Still, IIRC, Retrospect shouldn't need any RDU to support large File Backup Sets on locally attached volumes, only on network volumes.

 

From the limited log entries provided, the problem is shown when a Retrospect client is the Source, and the problem is not shown when the Source is a local drive on the machine running Retrospect.

 

- Have you had previous success when the Source is a Client?

- Have you seen the error when the Source is the local hard drive?

 

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two things happened to create this problem:

 

1) Client machines were upgraded to Leopard

2) Retrospect Software was updated to 6.1.138, Clients Upgraded to 6.1.130

 

- Have you had previous success when the Source is a Client?

- Have you seen the error when the Source is the local hard drive?

 

The only scenarios that I've ever tried have been with the current external firewire drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...