pronto Posted March 25, 2013 Report Share Posted March 25, 2013 Hi Community, during a backup an Exchange 2010 server loggs the following events: 204, 403, 401 Does anyone know what causes these errors or how we can prevent it? It should be related to VSS but I don't know how Retrospect deals with VSS Volumes. Thx & Bye Tom 1) 204 ---snip--- Protokollname: Application Quelle: Storage Group Consistency Check Datum: 21.03.2013 23:50:07 Ereignis-ID: 204 Aufgabenkategorie:(3) Ebene: Fehler Schlüsselwörter:Klassisch Benutzer: Nicht zutreffend Computer: UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local Beschreibung: Instance 2: An attempt to read the database header of '\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy11\VWL\VWL.edb' failed with error code -1811 (0xfffff8ed). Database header validation failed with this error. Ereignis-XML: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Storage Group Consistency Check" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">204</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>3</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-03-21T22:50:07.000000000Z" /> <EventRecordID>6398</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>2</Data> <Data>\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy11\VWL\VWL.edb</Data> <Data>-1811 (0xfffff8ed)</Data> </EventData> </Event> ---snap--- 2) 403 ---snip--- Protokollname: Application Quelle: Storage Group Consistency Check Datum: 21.03.2013 23:50:07 Ereignis-ID: 403 Aufgabenkategorie:(6) Ebene: Fehler Schlüsselwörter:Klassisch Benutzer: Nicht zutreffend Computer: UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local Beschreibung: Instance 2: The physical consistency check successfully validated 0 out of 4294967295 pages of database '\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy11\VWL\VWL.edb'. Because some database pages were either not validated or failed validation, the consistency check has been considered unsuccessful. Ereignis-XML: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Storage Group Consistency Check" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">403</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>6</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-03-21T22:50:07.000000000Z" /> <EventRecordID>6399</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>2</Data> <Data>0</Data> <Data>4294967295</Data> <Data>\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy11\VWL\VWL.edb</Data> </EventData> </Event> ---snap--- 3) 401 ---snip--- Protokollname: Application Quelle: Storage Group Consistency Check Datum: 21.03.2013 23:50:07 Ereignis-ID: 401 Aufgabenkategorie:(6) Ebene: Fehler Schlüsselwörter:Klassisch Benutzer: Nicht zutreffend Computer: UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local Beschreibung: Instance 2: The physical consistency check has completed, but one or more errors were detected. The consistency check has terminated with error code of -106 (0xffffff96). Ereignis-XML: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Storage Group Consistency Check" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">401</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>6</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2013-03-21T22:50:07.000000000Z" /> <EventRecordID>6400</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>UNIVERSE.DOMAIN.local</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>2</Data> <Data>-106 (0xffffff96)</Data> </EventData> </Event> ---snap--- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pronto Posted April 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2013 Okay, here I'm again to complete my soliloquy but maybe someone else could use this information in the future. The VSS related errors 401, 403 and 204 appear when the Exchange database and the transaction logs are stored seperated on different volumes. Since Microsoft recommend under many circumstances differents volumes for the logs and the database I would appreciate a fix for this problem. We are using Version 8.1 for both the server and the agent. Thx & Bye Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vac Posted May 11, 2013 Report Share Posted May 11, 2013 push - important thing to fix restrospect! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdunagan Posted May 12, 2013 Report Share Posted May 12, 2013 Thanks for the detailed writeup. We plan to fix this issue (bug 2325) in an upcoming release. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.