Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'tape'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Announcements, News and Resources
    • Latest News
  • Windows Products-Retrospect
    • Professional
    • Server, SBS and Multi Server
    • Device and Hardware Compatibility-Windows
    • Exchange Server Add-On Support
    • SQL Server Agent
    • Linux, Unix and Netware Clients
    • Express for Windows
    • Product Suggestions-Windows
  • Mac OS X Products-Retrospect
    • Retrospect 9 or higher for Macintosh
    • Retrospect 8 For Macintosh
    • Retrospect 6: Desktop, Workgroup and Server for Mac OS X
    • Device and Hardware Compatibility-Mac OS X
    • Linux Clients
    • Product Suggestions-Mac OS X
  • Macintosh OS 9 and Earlier-Retrospect
    • Express, Desktop, Workgroup and Server for Pre-OS X
    • Device and Hardware Compatibility Pre OS X
  • General Discussion-Retrospect
    • Networking and Clients
    • Strategy, Scripts and General Use
    • Retrospect iPhone App
  • Retrospect 8.x for Mac
  • Retrospect 6.1 for Mac
  • Retrospect 7.7 for Windows
  • Retrospect 7.6 for Windows
  • Retrospect Express
  • General Discussion


There are no results to display.

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start





Website URL







  1. I am using Retrospect version 12.5 for Desktop. I have a LTO-4 5.25" SAS Drive (no autoloader) and 30 LTO-4 tapes that already labeled from the manufacturer. I want to add all the tapes to the same backup set and keep their unique names. Every time a tape is added to my single media set, Backup Set A, it automatically gets renamed to an incrementing number like 1-Backup Set A. After doing some research,I found a few people say that this will always be done by Retrospect. Unfortunately this is an inconvenience for me as my tapes are already nicely labeled like GHD633L4 so to label them differently in the software is just going to create confusion and more work for me. The way i see it, i am going to have to create a spreadsheet that says "GHD633L4" is "1-Backup Set A" and so on. Maybe I am missing something or still not understanding it. Is there a way for me to keep the unique tapes names in a backup set?
  2. I hit an assert just now. I had been dumping stuff to DDS tape, and was done. My tape drive is a USB DDS HP Dat-72 drive. I powered down the HP DDS tape drive, and engine asserted. I can send the whole log and whatever other info required if this is something worth chasing. The start of the assert log is: ********************************************************************^M ^M Mac OS X OS Type: Darwin OS Release: 12.6.0 OS Version: Darwin Kernel Version 12.6.0: Wed Mar 18 16:23:48 PDT 2015; root:xnu-2050.48.19~1/RELEASE_X86_64 Machine: x86_64 Model: Macmini6,1 NCPU's: 4 PhysMem: 0x400000000^M Application: /Library/Application Support/Retrospect/RetrospectEngine.bundle/Contents/MacOS/RetrospectEngine, version Exception occurred on 2/26/2016 at 3:52:14 PM^M Error info: Assertion failure at "module.cpp-1063", on threadID 0x103604000 Signal no: 30 Assertion Error no: 00 Sig Code: 00 Fault Addr: 0x000000009267D686 -- "mach_msg_trap" Thread ID: 0x000000000180D040, Name: rax:0x000000000100001f r8:0x0000000000000107 r12:0x0000000000000003 rip:0x00007fff9267d686 cs:0x0000000000000007 rflags:0x0000000000000206 rbx:0x0000000000000028 r9:0x0000000000000000 r13:0x00007fff5fbf9c10 rsp:0x00007fff5fbf9ba8 rbp:0x00007fff5fbf9bf0 rcs:0x00007fff5fbf9ba8 r10:0x00000000000003b0 r14:0x0000000000000107 rsi:0x0000000000000003 fs:0x0000000000000000 rdx:0x0000000000000028 r11:0x0000000000000206 r15:0x00000000000003b0 rdi:0x00007fff5fbf9c10 gs:0x0000000000000000 Module Function + offset into function Args _______________ ________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ libsystem_kernel mach_msg_trap +0xa libbedrock.dylib TAddress::Dereference(unsigned int) cons +0x21 libbedrock.dylib TStackIA64::backtrace() +0xf6 libbedrock.dylib TStackBase::BacktraceMach(unsigned int, +0x34 libbedrock.dylib DebugHandler::generateExceptionReport(__ +0x183 libbedrock.dylib DebugHandler::SignalHandler(int, __sigin +0x2f libbedrock.dylib DebugHandler::DebugHandler() +0x0 libsystem_c.dyli _sigtramp +0x1a CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopServiceMachPort +0xc3 CoreFoundation __CFRunLoopRun +0x436 CoreFoundation CFRunLoopRunSpecific +0x122 CoreFoundation CFRunLoopRun +0x61 libmeson.dylib cfRunLoopInTask(int) +0x13b libmeson.dylib doTask(long long, long long (*)(...), Mo +0x7ca libmeson.dylib TThread::TaskCall(long long, long long ( +0x515 libmeson.dylib TThread::CFRunMsgLoop(int) +0x36 libmeson.dylib doTask(long long, long long (*)(...), Mo +0x7ca libmeson.dylib TThread::TaskCall(long long, long long ( +0x515 libmeson.dylib mesonGo() +0x14d libmeson.dylib doTask(long long, long long (*)(...), Mo +0x7ca libmeson.dylib TThread::TaskCall(long long, long long ( +0x515 libmeson.dylib Meson(int) +0x11c RetrospectEngine main +0x573 RetrospectEngine start +0x34
  3. Hello, I just ran into nasty bug regarding 'Bindings' option in Media Sets. I have two tape libraries - older DLT-S4 and newer LTO5 one. When I try to change Media Set 'Bind to specific tape drives' option from default 'Any tape drive' to 'Selected tape drives', select specific drive and press Save - the option reverts itself to 'any' after a few seconds. I tried creating new Media Set, resetting Retrospect.app preferences, relaunching engine - nothing helps. Running any backup with two tape libraries connected makes Retrospect to archive alternating between two different formats on one Media Set. A nightmare. Is there any way to fix that? Now I have to manually disconnect or power down each library depending on a backup I want to commit. Thanks, W.
  4. Hi there, I can't verify my media set, which has one member marked as lost. During backup one of the tapes gone bad, so I trashed it, marked as lost in media set and restarted the backup. Now, I want to verify this set - and I can't, because Retrospect asks for member which is marked as lost and I don't have it. What is the purpose of this option then? How can I verify if my set is readable? Best, W.
  5. Hi there I'm using Retrospect for mac 10.5 with a Quantum Scalar i40. Im using 2,9TB LTO-5 Tapes. Within a Media Set I have 9 Tapes. By my calculations 9 X 2,9TB = 26,1TB. However Retrospect seems to be doing different mathamatics? (12,9TB) What am I missing? Please see screenshots attached:
  6. Okay. Here's my current dilemma... I've run into this issue and have tried to go around it as many ways as I can, but I somehow fall short each time. When trying to backup an external hard-drive to a tape, it has my Tape mistaken for another tape. It started off like this... 1) Switched out tape that was filled up pretty well. 2) Inserted tape to backup. 3) Created a new media set for that tape. 4) Made sure script was set up so that I did not do verification. 5) First job backed up successfully. 6) Tried to back up tape subsequently, but it said, "Needs Member Device." 7) Modified bindings by selecting a specific tape drive and tape, but it only backed up folders without their contents. 8) Resorted to restoring contents to an external hard-drive, which worked. 9) Erased tape COMPLETELY. 10) Shut down Quantum Drive. 11) Detached Quantum Drive. 12) Shut down iMac. 13) Turned on Quantum Drive. 14) Turned on iMac. 15) Started over Media Set--> Script --> Backup processes. 16) Successfully backed up files until I switched out external hard-drives. --> "Media Set Already In Use" Error message Have completed steps 8-16 a few times, but have decided that this isn't working very well. Here are some pictures as well.
  7. To that one superhero out there that knows Retrospect inside and out, here's the issue I'm dealing with... I try to backup files from hard-drive to Tape, and for whatever reason the only thing saved being saved right now are the folders themselves -- without the content in the folders. Anyone out there know why this is happening?
  8. Retro 9.0.2 (107), on OS X 10.6 mini with 8 GB memory. tape drive is HP storage works Dat 72 usb I am trying to copy a media set from disk to tape. Total size is about 90 GB. On the second tape, I get errors. I've tried this 3 times, and the error is about the same. twice it has happened on the same file. Once on another file "nearby". Log excerpts: + Executing copy_iCompute_year at 12/7/12 (Activity Thread 1) To Backup Set v9_iCompute_2012t... - 12/7/12 5:43:14 PM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/7/12 9:11:55 PM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t - 12/8/12 12:42:17 AM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/8/12 4:22:35 AM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 302823168) !Generated MD5 digest for file "Joy_HD_X/Users/cjl/Pictures/Bruce_9_13_09/Originals/2009/Jun 25, 2009/" does not match stored MD5 digest. !Backup Set format inconsistency (5 at 302822304) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 302818176) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 302817088) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 302816064) (repeated many times....) previous + Executing copy_iCompute_year at 12/7/12 (Activity Thread 1) To Backup Set v9_iCompute_2012t... - 12/7/12 12:22:11 AM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/7/12 3:51:42 AM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t - 12/7/12 10:42:37 AM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/7/12 2:22:52 PM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 302786496) !Generated MD5 digest for file "Joy_HD_X/Users/cjl/Pictures/Bruce_9_13_09/Originals/2009/Jun 26, 2009/" does not match stored MD5 digest. !Backup Set format inconsistency (5 at 312139968) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 312262592) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 332547344) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 317140112) (repeated many times....) and previous... + Executing copy_iCompute_year at 12/5/12 (Activity Thread 1) To Backup Set v9_iCompute_2012t... - 12/5/12 1:40:33 PM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/5/12 5:09:11 PM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t - 12/5/12 9:21:03 PM: Transferring from v9_iCompute_2012 - 12/6/12 1:02:50 AM: Verifying v9_iCompute_2012t !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 297431856) !Generated MD5 digest for file "Joy_HD_X/Users/cjl/Pictures/Bruce_9_13_09/Originals/2009/Jun 25, 2009/" does not match stored MD5 digest. !Backup Set format inconsistency (5 at 316160816) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 316426624) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315258976) (repeated many times....) I already tried using a different tape. The first two were the same tape, the third try was a different tape (different manufacturer, too). After the second failure, I did a verify on the source media set, and it came through clean. This looks like some sort of bug to me. Tape is relatively imprecise in the face of errors and bad media. I would expect that if this were a device or media problem with recording the data, the error would change from run to run, but this is a little too consistent. I also would expect it to behave differently with a different physical tape. It would be nice to have timestamps on the errors. I could at least tell whether this is happening at the beginning, end, or middle of the tape. As it is, I have no idea. Writing these tapes takes hours. Despite all these errors, is any of the data written to these tapes retrievable? I'm inclined to treat the whole set as worthless if the copy process does not come through "clean". Is there some different procedure I can use to make this work?
  9. Hello All, I was hoping someone could shed some light on an issue I am having little luck with. I have been put in charge of a large database of backups. At the time there was an SCSI based SDX-500c on the shelf labeled broken and another in service (I have been using till now). The one in service slowly died with increasing errors. I had suggested servicing the drives but was discouraged from that as other IT people began lending us their AIT machines. An SDX-500c with a USB enclosure and an SDX-900v with SCSI as well. The only thing that worked to read the tape library was to use the original machine. I stripped off the enclosure and mounted it in a PC with a terminated cable and that has kept us alive. I am now terrified that if this machine dies it will mean all of our tapes are unreadable. I am starting to think I should begin transferring the data on the tapes through another machine. Hopefully creating media that can be read on a more reliable machine. I know tape is a bit finicky and because I am younger I haven't really been exposed to scuzzy beyond hardware IDs and terminators. Is there something critical I have missed? Thanks. EDIT: I have now found that the other Sony SDX-500c is not recognizing tapes possibly due to the contacts in the drive that seat against the back of the tape. I am going to try and swab it I suppose. Couldn't hurt. I am using Retrospect 7.6 for the data sets. No older or newer versions. Thanks! JV
  10. I have an HP DAT-72 tape drive (HP-Storageworks - USB) and it has an annoying bug. When I am doing an operation, and I put in a cleaning tape, the script "hangs" for several minutes. In "Storage Devices", the drive shows up "Empty", and the script is "waiting for media". It seems nothing I do will free it, except to wait about 2-3 minutes. It then resumes operation. Annoying.
  11. The first LTO-6 products are starting to get available (finally). We plan to move to a Tandberg T40+ Library with a new Tandberg LTO-6 HH (FC) drive using Retrospect Multiserver on OS X. Is there already a timing or a time frame when we can expect LTO-6 support?
  12. Hi! I have recently been trying out the new Retrospect 10 and unfortunately I have had the same trouble with it as Retrospect 9. Whenever I try to backup to our HP Ultrium 448 LTO2 SCSI drive on Mac OS X 10.7.3 I get a "error -100 ( device rejected command)" which effectively aborts the backup. I have no trouble short erasing or long erasing tapes and adding them to backup sets. It is only when I try to backup to them that the error occurs. Anybody got any ideas what to do next? Backup with PreSTORE and BRU to this drive works without issues. Cheers, Chris W.
  13. I am testing the media set that I copied to tape with the scary error messages to see if I can restore from it. I want to restore several volumes, including those that got the errors, to see what will happen with the files that got the errors. see: http://forums.retrospect.com/index.php?/topic/150058-recurring-format-inconsistency-on-tape-same-file/ I don't want to free up the disk space when I am not confident that the tape copy is reliable. In trying to do several restores, I wanted to "stack up" a couple of jobs. While the first restore was running, I tried to set up a second restore to run as soon as the first was done. I could not do this, because the backups on the tape set that is in use are not available/not visible - at all. I can't see the backups, or retrieve new ones. It appears that the media set is "locked", and while locked, its content - including all backups/snapshots are invisible. I think it should be possible to schedule backups on media sets while locked. The media set is being used in read-only mode, so this should not be impossible.
  14. I am running Retrospect (and have been since 6.1) on an Xserve 3,1 running Mac OS X Server 10.6.8 with 12Gigs of RAM, 24TB of Active Storage backup disk space and a Quantum Scalar 50 LTO-4 Two Drive Fibre Channel tape library connected via a QLogic 5602 FC Switch with Zoning enabled. I have Advanced Tape Support as part of my licensing. I upgraded Retrospect on this Xserve about 2 weeks ago from 9.0.2 (107) Multi Server/Unlimited Clients to 10.0.1 (105) Multi Server/Unlimited clients. Everything appeared to be OK during the upgrade. Everything remained intact. After the upgrade I immediately started to notice the following day a change in the way Retro 10 scans files and accounts for them. Background: I have a staged backup system in place so that, using Carbon Copy Cloner, I clone two source disks from two different Xserve with the same aforementioned specs. I clone to sync, removing any data on the destination which does not exist on the source. One source has about 5.3 TB and the other about 100GB. They are cloned every 4 hours onto one 12TB Active Storage LUN. From here I use a Retrospect backup to Tape script to perform one Full backup of the 12TB backup disk over the weekend and then incrementals nightly during the week. A new Media set is started during the Full weekend and Skip to New Member is used for incrementals since the tapes are removed offsite daily the following morning. This system has worked flawlessly for several years over several versions of Retrospect and countless Restores have been successfully performed both during DR drills and real emergencies. After upgrading to version 10 I noticed that Retrospect was 'seeing' about 128GB of data during a newly instituted Full backup over the weekend. The Tape Media set showed 128GB in size for the Full backup. Normally the full 5.4 TB was scanned and backed up at the start of a Full backup to a new Media set and then the incrementals averaged about 20GB during the nightly backups during the week. So essentially Retrospect was missing 99% of the data. I even created a new script to make sure that it was not a corrupted script caused by the upgrade to 10. Same results. Retrospect was scanning about 128 GB for the Full backup and 24k or so for the following incrementals. I noticed in the Logs for each backup a mention of the new Instant Scan process. Searching the documentation for 10 and then Forum topics related to Instant Scan (ISA), none of which seemed to mention my specific issue, I decided to disable the ISA process. Once I did that Retrospect performed as expected, 'seeing' all of the data on the source volume (5.4TB total) and backing up all of the data to tape during the Full backup and any changes during the incremental. Am I missing something? Is what I described the proper functionality with the new ISA process? This seems to affect all scripts. I have another Disk to Disk script with the same symptoms when ISA is enabled. Keeping ISA disabled for now. Thanks for any insights...
  15. Hello! We backup our work projects using a LTO tape drive and Retrospect 9. Is there a way to scan a tape to see its content? In a terminal maybe? We had this backup computer using Retrospect 6 but it's dead now. We bought a new computer and new LTO tape drive (went from LTO 3 to 5). I am trying to figure a way to rebuild an old catalog, but by splitting its members (tapes) into different catalogs. The original one had over a hundred members (bad idea) and rebuilding the whole thing would take a couple lifetimes. I would love to be able to see the content of the tapes because we don't need all of our old projects. Maybe I could skip a few tapes and save some time that way. Thank you!
  16. For the life of me I can't figure out how to exclude certain file types (in my case, specifically, .DS_Store files) from restores from a tape media set. Any suggestions / solutions? I'm using Retrospect 9.0.2 Mac on Mac OSX Server 10.6.8 Cheers C
  17. When I plug in my tape drive, the retrospect engine does not "see" it until I restart the engine. This may be as intended, but if so, is not mentioned in the documentation that I can find. The "rescan" operation did not appear to pick up the tape drive, but I didn't wait 2 minutes. ;-> Retro, Mac OS X 10.5.8, DDS USB tape drive. -dgl-
  18. I am rebuilding the catalogs on some Retro 6.1 tapes to see if I can restore from them. When the first rebuild was done, I looked at the log: + Executing Rebuild at 4/22/12 (Activity Thread 1) To Backup Set MercyShare10 [001]... !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 317871024) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 317768288) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 317960128) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 36464464) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 317530656) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 295383072) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 296098384) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 293092656) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 295433920) ... ... a whole bunch of these..... ... !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 314986544) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315011504) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315020688) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315034864) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315057760) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315054256) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315097008) !Backup Set format inconsistency (4 at 315105376) 4/22/12 10:09:19 PM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 3173 files, 39.7 GB Performance: 150.3 MB/minute Duration: 07:16:45 (02:46:45 idle/loading/preparing) What is this "inconsistency" it is complaining about, and then deciding that the rebuild went just fine!?? There were three tapes in this set.
  19. I recently enabled the tape cleaning interval after reading on HP's website that 24 hours of "pulling tape" is the recommended interval between cleaning for my drive (HP storage works DAT72 drive). I find that with this set to non-zero, Retro 9.0.2 will send me email when the tape needs to be cleaned. Cool. Question: Aside from the email, I see no indication that I need to clean the tape drive. If I'm not set up to send email from the engine, how does Retro tell me to clean the drive? Am I missing something on the console? Is there a counter somewhere that tells me how many hours have been racked up?
  20. It happened several days ago, and I'm not certain about the sequence any more, but I think the story was like this. I was doing something with the tape, and Retrospect 9.0.2 requested another tape. I took the opportunity to clean the tape ddrive, but Retro didn't "see" the cleaning tape. When the cleaning was done, I put in the tape it was asking for, and the display persisted as "empty" (no media). I futzed with "scan" and "scan all" and waited a bit, but nothing changed. Thinking this might be an issue with the drive, I power cycled the drive. Mistake. As I recall, when I powered up the drive, and tried o operate on it, the console hung. Then I tried cycling the engine, and the engine hung. It was a busy hang, as I recall. I could not get the console to connect at all, nor get the control panel to stop the engine. I ended up killing the engine (kill <pid>) The attached file is a sample of the engine from Activity Monitor. Lesson: don't take devices away when Retro need them, or it gets unhappy. Sample of RetroEngine.txt.zip
  21. This has been a real frustration to me. I now know how to work around it, and describe how to reproduce it. I have tracked down the trigger for a problem where I rebuild my v6.1 tapes, and Retrospect 9 happily reads the entire tape set, but comes out with a catalog showing zero files. I have documented several similar cases of this here. I have not tried to explore all the combinations of conditions on this, just the ones that were relevant to me. My tape drive is a USB HP DAT72 tape drive (Storage Works). Retro, Mac OS X 10.6 One procedure for reproducing this bug is as follows: 1. Ensure that the tape you want to rebuild does not have a v9 catalog. Tape drive should be empty. 2. Go to the "Media Sets" display, and click on "rebuild". The first dialog selects the type of rebuild. Choose "tape". Click "next". 3. Next dialog selects the device. Choose the (empty) tape drive. Click "next..." 4. Next dialog chooses the location of the catalog. Wait here. Timing is important. Select your catalog location, but DON'T click "rebuild". 5. Insert the tape in the drive. 6. Immediately hit "rebuild" in the dialog. You will get an error. Keep clicking "rebuild" until the dialog is dismissed. Watch the activity, and watch Retro read the tape, without effect - note in the summary window in the activity that no files are counted, and no MB/s rate is displayed. It will read the entire tape, and do nothing. On the other hand, If you wait until Retro has recognized the tape before you click "rebuild", it will work fine. I smell a race, and user frustration for the impatient. (like me. ;->)
  22. I rebuilt 4 retro 6.1 "quarterly" sets from tape, and copied the data to a single disk set. The fourth set suffered from the problem above, with the zillions of "inconsistency (2 at ....)" errors, and then the resultant rebuilt catalog was empty. (see here ) I just upgraded to Retro 9.0.2, and re-did the catalog rebuild. To my surprise, the catalog is being built *cleanly* - no errors. Is this a fix in 9.0.2? Is this an intermittent bug in 9.0.1? Is the process of reading the tape unreliable? What's up with this?
  23. Not much info on this one. I was rebuilding a 6.1 tape set, and it hit an error. The tape drive "clean" light came on after this happened. The log looks like this: + Executing Rebuild at 4/28/12 (Activity Thread 2) To Backup Set iCompute11 [001]... !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble positioning: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble positioning: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble positioning: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble reading: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) !Trouble positioning: "1-iCompute11 [001]" (649462), error -206 ( drive reported a failure: dirty heads, bad media, etc.) Additional error information for device "HP DAT DDS-DC" [0:0], Sense > f0 00 03 00 00 00 04 0e 00 00 00 00 11 00 00 00 00 8d (぀灒翿 |぀灒翿 |぀灒翿 ) 4/28/12 7:46:45 PM: Execution stopped by operator Completed: 157495 files, 18.6 GB Performance: 164.4 MB/minute Duration: 04:25:21 (02:29:38 idle/loading/preparing) The interesting thing is that the last 3 lines in the log above did not show up, and the tape drive stopped responding. The engine was clearly "stuck", thinking the drive had nothing in it. I manually ejected and re-inserted the tape, and the console did not "see" it. I restarted the engine, and the last 3 ines showed up in the log and the tape drive started responding again. Mac OS X 10.6.8, 8 GB mem, mini. Retro
  24. Retro Mac OS X 10.6.8 I had a tape rebuild in progress, and mistakenly hit "verify" on a different V9 tape media set. The v9 media set changed status to "busy". The rebuild finished, and the v9 set stayed "busy". There is no activity to cancel, and it looks like the only way I can "un-busy" the tape set is to restart the engine. Other operations on the busy tape set fail. A copy says it is busy, and a verify simply says "error"
  25. I'm having all sorts of trouble rebuilding a particular tape set. The log looks like this: + Executing Rebuild at 4/28/12 (Activity Thread 1) To Backup Set iCompute11 [001]... SixOneTree:TAddAbstractFile failed objects.nib !Not enough application memory 4/28/12 9:20:47 PM: Execution incomplete Completed: 326998 files, 19.9 GB Performance: 234.7 MB/minute Duration: 01:25:57 (00:00:01 idle/loading/preparing) Retro, Mac OS X 10.6.8, mini, 8 GB mem. This is the third time I've tried to do this. The first time I got this error. The second was the error under "Tape stops responding after error", and now this, which looks exactly like the first. There is something poisoned about this tape, I think.
  • Create New...