kaikow Posted September 11, 2003 Report Share Posted September 11, 2003 Somehow, I know not how, I managed to create another volume with the same name as an existing volume. I believe that this occurred while I was fiddling with Find-ing a file. It would have been useful to receive a warning of the potential damage that I discoverd a few hours later. When I attempted to run a script, I was informed that a source volume did not exist. When I looked at the script, I saw volumeF was listed twice. One of the properties of the first volumeF was to Forget the volume, so I chose that, assuming that the 2nd volumeF would stick. Note that the 2nd volumeF did not have a Forget property. Well, I ASSuMEd incorrectly. When I ran the script, volumeF was not backed up. Fortunately, I always examine the log file, so I noticed this right away. My suggestion is that more warnings be added: 1. When a conflicting name is created. 2. When such a conflict has an effect on a script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmyJ Posted September 18, 2003 Report Share Posted September 18, 2003 The ghosted volume that you "forgot" was the original volume. The volume changed in such a way that it appeared to be a different volume - hence it was listed twice. Retrospect will always list 'remembered' volumes because they may be part of a script or they may re-appear as a result of being plugged in, attached, etc. Retrospect will not automatically update your script with the 'new' F: drive. When you 'forgot' the original F: drive, Retrospect would have prompted you with a message similar to "F: is part of backup script xxx. Do you really want to forget?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.