jhg Posted March 2, 2003 Report Share Posted March 2, 2003 I recently had to reinstall Win2K, and during the reinstall of Retrospect 6.0 I found a file 60pro.exe in my Dantz downloads folder. This file contains a file called patch.rpx, and looking around in my backup copy of the old C drive I find that it was installed in the Retrospect directory. However, I cannot find any mention of this patch on the Dantz website. What does it patch? Do I need it? The file dates are: retro_60_pro_ug.exe 7/23/2002 pro60.exe 8/7/2002 If I had to guess, I'd say the version of the upgrade I have needs the patch but the current one on the website incorporates it. Correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmyJ Posted March 3, 2003 Report Share Posted March 3, 2003 This patch addressed a license issue with tape drives when upgrading from 5.6 Express to 6.0 Professional. If you are doing a clean install of Retrospect 6.0 (not an upgrade) this patch should not be needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhg Posted March 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted March 4, 2003 The version I installed is the "6.0 Upgrade" that I purchased and downloaded from the website. However, I was installing on a cleanly formatted C: partition and it never asked to see the 5.6 media and installed OK even though 5.6 wasn't installed at that point. Does this version need the patch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyJohn Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 Quote: This patch addressed a license issue with tape drives when upgrading from 5.6 Express to 6.0 Professional. If you are doing a clean install of Retrospect 6.0 (not an upgrade) this patch should not be needed. I was probably the one who found this issue back in August 2002 when Retro 6 was released. My proble was not related to an upgrade. I encountered it on a clean install of Retrospect Professional. If I remember right, when started for the first time the program asked for the license code. I would enter it and the code was not accepted. From my discussions with Matthew Hanagan of Tech Support it appeared that this was an issue only when certain backup devices were present. I was using the OnStream DI-30 tape drive. A day later Dantz came up with the patch. The patch is now incorporated in the downloaded file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.