Jump to content

Very slow verify


jdpal

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am running Retro 7.6 on W2k3. I recently expanded the C: partition from 12GB to 50GB as I heard it would help media verify operation. It appears that my disk sets do indeed do media verifies faster.

 

However, I have a tape set that crawls on verify no matter if it's media verification or thorough verification.

 

Here is the log from the latest job, which I cancelled after 2 days...

 

 

+ Recycle backup using Servers at 11/21/2008 8:00 PM (Execution unit 2)

To Backup Set Servers B...

11/21/2008 8:00:01 PM: Recycle backup: The Backup Set was reset

 

- 11/21/2008 8:00:01 PM: Copying Accounting on CLEESE

11/21/2008 8:06:21 PM: Snapshot stored, 91 KB

11/21/2008 8:06:22 PM: Comparing Accounting on CLEESE

11/21/2008 8:40:58 PM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 149 files, 538.7 MB

Performance: 30.4 MB/minute (371.4 copy, 15.8 compare)

Duration: 00:40:57 (00:05:33 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/21/2008 8:41:01 PM: Copying Repositories on Dev Server

11/21/2008 8:45:23 PM: Snapshot stored, 2,085 KB

11/21/2008 8:45:28 PM: Comparing Repositories on Dev Server

11/21/2008 11:56:53 PM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 8854 files, 4.0 GB

Performance: 42.0 MB/minute (1054.5 copy, 21.4 compare)

Duration: 03:15:52 (00:01:59 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/21/2008 11:56:54 PM: Copying ebooksearch on FERRELL

11/21/2008 11:57:44 PM: Snapshot stored, 17 KB

11/21/2008 11:57:46 PM: Comparing ebooksearch on FERRELL

11/21/2008 11:58:27 PM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 21 files, 755 KB

Performance: 9.8 MB/minute (6.3 copy, 44.2 compare)

Duration: 00:01:33 (00:01:24 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/21/2008 11:58:29 PM: Copying vPage on FERRELL

11/22/2008 12:07:34 AM: Snapshot stored, 20.9 MB

11/22/2008 12:07:54 AM: Comparing vPage on FERRELL

11/22/2008 2:03:39 AM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 138274 files, 2.9 GB

Performance: 47.9 MB/minute (392.1 copy, 25.5 compare)

Duration: 02:05:09 (00:03:03 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/22/2008 2:03:41 AM: Copying Tomcat 6.0 on MAHER

11/22/2008 2:04:38 AM: Snapshot stored, 86 KB

11/22/2008 2:04:39 AM: Comparing Tomcat 6.0 on MAHER

11/22/2008 2:04:56 AM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 246 files, 47.7 MB

Performance: 439.5 MB/minute (357.0 copy, 714.1 compare)

Duration: 00:01:15 (00:01:01 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/22/2008 2:04:59 AM: Copying Tomcat 6.0 on lewis

11/22/2008 2:10:49 AM: Snapshot stored, 95 KB

11/22/2008 2:10:51 AM: Comparing Tomcat 6.0 on lewis

11/22/2008 2:55:11 AM: Execution completed successfully

Completed: 309 files, 4.2 GB

Performance: 183.8 MB/minute (867.0 copy, 102.8 compare)

Duration: 00:50:12 (00:03:50 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

- 11/22/2008 2:55:13 AM: Copying syncdata on lewis

11/22/2008 6:43:45 AM: Snapshot stored, 52.4 MB

11/22/2008 6:44:34 AM: Comparing syncdata on lewis

11/24/2008 9:28:33 AM: Execution stopped by operator

Remaining: 141244 files, 152.9 GB

Completed: 71156 files, 124.4 GB

Performance: 126.2 MB/minute (1280.7 copy, 41.9 compare)

Duration: 2 06:33:21 (00:15:59 idle/loading/preparing)

 

11/24/2008 9:29:09 AM: Execution stopped by operator

Total performance: 118.9 MB/minute

Total duration: 2 13:28:33 (00:32:51 idle/loading/preparing)

 

 

Any suggestions for what to look at to increase the verify speeds? This is on thorough verification but the results have been similar with media verify.

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mayoff,

 

I ran a cleaning tape through the drive twice. The drive did need to be cleaned (and apparently there was not a cleaning tape in the autoloader for quite some time).

 

It is a Sony AIT-4 DC drive in a Qualstar robotic library, attached via SCSI.

 

I performed the following tests:

 

I took a brand new tape and created a new tape set for it, adding it as the only member. I then backed up a 10GB folder full of MP3 files. The backup averaged 1266MB/Min. I had it set to media verify. The media verify chugged along at about 65MB/Min before I canceled it.

 

Then I did a restore from that new tape to a hard drive array directly attached to the retrospect server. The restore also chugged along at about 65MB/Min.

 

I did not switch SCSI cables simply because the writing is fine but the reading isn't. What do you suggest? Is there a way in Retrospect to get more information about the slowdown?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...