jdpal Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Hi, I am running Retro 7.6 on W2k3. I recently expanded the C: partition from 12GB to 50GB as I heard it would help media verify operation. It appears that my disk sets do indeed do media verifies faster. However, I have a tape set that crawls on verify no matter if it's media verification or thorough verification. Here is the log from the latest job, which I cancelled after 2 days... + Recycle backup using Servers at 11/21/2008 8:00 PM (Execution unit 2) To Backup Set Servers B... 11/21/2008 8:00:01 PM: Recycle backup: The Backup Set was reset - 11/21/2008 8:00:01 PM: Copying Accounting on CLEESE 11/21/2008 8:06:21 PM: Snapshot stored, 91 KB 11/21/2008 8:06:22 PM: Comparing Accounting on CLEESE 11/21/2008 8:40:58 PM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 149 files, 538.7 MB Performance: 30.4 MB/minute (371.4 copy, 15.8 compare) Duration: 00:40:57 (00:05:33 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/21/2008 8:41:01 PM: Copying Repositories on Dev Server 11/21/2008 8:45:23 PM: Snapshot stored, 2,085 KB 11/21/2008 8:45:28 PM: Comparing Repositories on Dev Server 11/21/2008 11:56:53 PM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 8854 files, 4.0 GB Performance: 42.0 MB/minute (1054.5 copy, 21.4 compare) Duration: 03:15:52 (00:01:59 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/21/2008 11:56:54 PM: Copying ebooksearch on FERRELL 11/21/2008 11:57:44 PM: Snapshot stored, 17 KB 11/21/2008 11:57:46 PM: Comparing ebooksearch on FERRELL 11/21/2008 11:58:27 PM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 21 files, 755 KB Performance: 9.8 MB/minute (6.3 copy, 44.2 compare) Duration: 00:01:33 (00:01:24 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/21/2008 11:58:29 PM: Copying vPage on FERRELL 11/22/2008 12:07:34 AM: Snapshot stored, 20.9 MB 11/22/2008 12:07:54 AM: Comparing vPage on FERRELL 11/22/2008 2:03:39 AM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 138274 files, 2.9 GB Performance: 47.9 MB/minute (392.1 copy, 25.5 compare) Duration: 02:05:09 (00:03:03 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/22/2008 2:03:41 AM: Copying Tomcat 6.0 on MAHER 11/22/2008 2:04:38 AM: Snapshot stored, 86 KB 11/22/2008 2:04:39 AM: Comparing Tomcat 6.0 on MAHER 11/22/2008 2:04:56 AM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 246 files, 47.7 MB Performance: 439.5 MB/minute (357.0 copy, 714.1 compare) Duration: 00:01:15 (00:01:01 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/22/2008 2:04:59 AM: Copying Tomcat 6.0 on lewis 11/22/2008 2:10:49 AM: Snapshot stored, 95 KB 11/22/2008 2:10:51 AM: Comparing Tomcat 6.0 on lewis 11/22/2008 2:55:11 AM: Execution completed successfully Completed: 309 files, 4.2 GB Performance: 183.8 MB/minute (867.0 copy, 102.8 compare) Duration: 00:50:12 (00:03:50 idle/loading/preparing) - 11/22/2008 2:55:13 AM: Copying syncdata on lewis 11/22/2008 6:43:45 AM: Snapshot stored, 52.4 MB 11/22/2008 6:44:34 AM: Comparing syncdata on lewis 11/24/2008 9:28:33 AM: Execution stopped by operator Remaining: 141244 files, 152.9 GB Completed: 71156 files, 124.4 GB Performance: 126.2 MB/minute (1280.7 copy, 41.9 compare) Duration: 2 06:33:21 (00:15:59 idle/loading/preparing) 11/24/2008 9:29:09 AM: Execution stopped by operator Total performance: 118.9 MB/minute Total duration: 2 13:28:33 (00:32:51 idle/loading/preparing) Any suggestions for what to look at to increase the verify speeds? This is on thorough verification but the results have been similar with media verify. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayoff Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Slow tape reads could be caused by dirty tape heads or even a device communication problem. You can try different device cables after cleaning the tape heads. what type of tape drive is this? How is it connected? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdpal Posted November 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 Hi Mayoff, I ran a cleaning tape through the drive twice. The drive did need to be cleaned (and apparently there was not a cleaning tape in the autoloader for quite some time). It is a Sony AIT-4 DC drive in a Qualstar robotic library, attached via SCSI. I performed the following tests: I took a brand new tape and created a new tape set for it, adding it as the only member. I then backed up a 10GB folder full of MP3 files. The backup averaged 1266MB/Min. I had it set to media verify. The media verify chugged along at about 65MB/Min before I canceled it. Then I did a restore from that new tape to a hard drive array directly attached to the retrospect server. The restore also chugged along at about 65MB/Min. I did not switch SCSI cables simply because the writing is fine but the reading isn't. What do you suggest? Is there a way in Retrospect to get more information about the slowdown? Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mayoff Posted November 24, 2008 Report Share Posted November 24, 2008 The drive could have a problem with the read heads. It may be worth contacting Sony about this problem. I have seen it before, and drive failure is a possibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdpal Posted December 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 4, 2008 Hi Mayoff, We did a firmware upgrade which solved the performance problem with reads. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.