Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
palter

Product Features and Upgrades

Recommended Posts

I own Retrospect Backup Workgroup for Windows 5.6 because, at one time in late 1999, I needed to backup 12 machines as part of an intellectual property rights transfer.

 

 

 

Given that I now only have three machines to backup, I decided that, rather than upgrading to Single Server ($399) or Multi Server ($649), I would simply purchase a new copy of Professional. (The prices shown here are the upgrade prices according to http://www.dantz.com/upgrades/.)

 

 

 

But then I took a look at the Windows Product Comparison Chart (http://www.dantz.com/products/wincompare.html).

 

 

 

One of my clients is a Linux box. (It's used as a workstation not as a server.) According to the chart, the only way I can backup a Linux client is to upgrade to Multi Server! Is that true?

 

 

 

In response to some questions about 6.0 I asked on 6/26, Mayoff responded (http://forums.dantz.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Board=Server&Number=9554) that

 

 

 

(2) Users who upgrade will not need to purchase disaster recovery as an add-on.

 

 

 

However, I see no mention of that fact on the web site. Is it still true?

 

 

 

Finally, the comparison chart implies that Open File Backup isn't available for Professional? Is that correct? (I really liked this feature based on my experiences during the beta test.)

 

 

 

- Gary Palter

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You must have the mult-server version in order to backup a Linux or Unix client.

 

 

 

If you upgrade, you will get Disaster Recovery.

 

 

 

If you want to use our Open File Backup you must have Single Server version at the minimum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

> You must have the mult-server version in order to backup a Linux or Unix client.

 

 

 

I think it's a mistake to treat all Linux clients as servers. The Linux community is making a strong push to get people to use Linux as a Windows replacement. There are many Linux systems out there being used as workstations. (That's how I use mine; I do software development on it.)

 

 

 

I can't justify a $649 upgrade just so I can backup my Linux workstation.

 

 

 

I strongly urge you to have whoever made this decision reconsider...

 

 

 

> If you upgrade, you will get Disaster Recovery.

 

 

 

Good. Perhaps you could update the website to reflect this. Right now, it simply says that I can upgrade to Single Server for $399 or Multi Server for $649. If it said "Single Server with Disaster Recovery" for $399 or "Multi Server with Disaster Recovery" for $649, I think that would make it clear that we aren't losing any functionality when we upgrade.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I entirely agree. I have a Linux box as a firewall, and I'd like to back it up, but paying for the Multi server is ridiculous just for that. Unix might have been considered only a server system at one time, but no longer. I guess for now I'll have to continue using dump to my PC's file system. Sigh ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×