Stackhouse Posted April 2, 2007 Report Share Posted April 2, 2007 Wrote too soon. Overrun detected well after copy began. Very strange. Should have waited. Now, buffer overrun begins immediately upon copy (after grooming, comparing, etc.) Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stackhouse Posted April 3, 2007 Report Share Posted April 3, 2007 After more investigation, I find that I have more than one 7.5 installer. Something of an installer pack rat, I suppose: 1- a folder labeled (by me, I am sure) Retrospect 7.5 -- this from purchase on 12/2006. 2- Retro-EN_7_5_370.exe, recently from the website. 3- ru759102.exe from update. 4- Retro-EN_7_5_324.exe. I received the buffer overrun (assert elem.cpp 993, and a nasty mess of assert junk with it) from applying 2- and then 3-. I also received it from applying 2- alone. However, when I apply the original 1- I received, there is no buffer overrun and no assert log after a successful backup. I did not try 4-. When applying 2- and 3-, the help about says 7.5.370 -- 7.5.10.104, and not ...102. Same help-about info when applying 3. I am not certain that this is correct, or if it may reside in the registry or configuration file. It might indeed be ...370 without hotfix, as I did not remove the configuration folder from all users before reinstalling. I can say that it "seems" that the interfaces are different -- I feel pretty certain I saw a difference in the advanced selection criteria interface between the two versions 1-&2-, and 3-: when selecting backup all except cache files, then choosing advanced, in 1-&2- the all but cache setting persists into the advanced screen, while in 3- it does not. Maybe my imagination, but maybe not. All of these installers came from the website. So, I would have to conclude that there is an issue with the 7.5 and hotfix installers. Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertdana Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 I just had a server start doing the buffer overrun thing. It's very frequent, and is impairing our backups. Are there any updates on this issue? Our setup: Retrospect Single Server 7.5.370, Update 7.5.10.104 Windows XP SP2, P4 3.2GHz, 1GB RAM Proactive backup, backing up 15 desktop clients Backing up to one internal removable SATA drive in a tray and an external 250 drive The crash happens most frequently when polling machines for proactive backup (judging by the assert log) with no active backups running- often within a minute or two of allowing proactive backup to run Perhaps 370MB total commit charge- no unusual memory consumption that I can see. Typical assert log error (each error is repeated over and over): XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX OS: Windows XP version 5.1 (build 2600), Service Pack 2, (32 bit) Application: C:\Program Files\Retrospect\Retrospect 7.5\Retrospect.exe, version 7.5.370 Driver Update and Hot Fix version 7.5.10.104 Exception occurred on 4/19/2007 at 10:04:20 PM Error info: Assertion failure at "elem.cpp-993" Exception code: e0000000 ASSERTION Fault address: 7c812a5b 0001:00011a5b (null) Thread ID: 1504, Name: Backup server source polling EAX:02922884 CS:001b EIP:7c812a5b EFlags:00000206 EBX:00b64c02 SS:0023 ESP:02922880 EBP: 029228d4 ECX:00000000 DS:0023 ESI:02922914 FS: 003b EDX:00000001 ES:0023 EDI:02922914 GS: 0000 Module Fn (symbol or seg:offset in DLL) Args =============== ================================= ============================= Module Fn (symbol or seg:offset in DLL) Args ntdll.dll 0001:0000db94 1c2eac4 0 0 190001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmyJ Posted April 20, 2007 Report Share Posted April 20, 2007 Please see the following link for assert troubleshooting: http://kb.dantz.com/article.asp?article=6306&p=2 You can also go to http://kb.dantz.com/ and click on Solution Finder for a mini troubleshooting wizard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.