Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

An incremental backup of 60G on an 80G internal HD can take only a few minutes, but the preceding scan time seems forever. Is there a way to speed up the scan? Thanks.

 

[Retrospect version 6.0.204; Mac OS 10.3.9; 750MB RAM; backing up 60G from internal 8OG via Firewire to OWC HD 250G.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for Retrospect to copy only files that have changed, it has to look at every file and compare them to what it has already copied in past backups.

 

If you're backing up the entire hard drive, it has to scan the entire drive.

 

Since backup needs are different for different users, there's no one answer. But one thing you can do is define your Home directory as a sub-volume, and use that for your more frequent backups. Then run the whole volume backup less often, under the assumption that things such as /System/ and /Library/ change much less often then /Users/

 

You can use different Scripts, with different Sources, that all write to the same Destination.

 

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Are you comparing a Mac and a PC with about the same number of files and about the same age? I mean an old Mac with 300,000 files compared to a brand new hi-tech PC with just 50,000 files, who "wins"?

 

After the scanning and backup of a PC, Retrospect has to build a "snapshot" which takes much longer than the scanning. Have you taken that time into the equation?

 

Regards

Lennart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Hi.

 

Are you comparing a Mac and a PC with about the same number of files and about the same age? I mean an old Mac with 300,000 files compared to a brand new hi-tech PC with just 50,000 files, who "wins"?

 

After the scanning and backup of a PC, Retrospect has to build a "snapshot" which takes much longer than the scanning. Have you taken that time into the equation?

 

Regards

Lennart

 


 

Yes - roughly equivilent hardware, and equivilent file numbers...

 

It *seems* faster, though I haven't actually measured it. I shall at my next oppertunity.

However, *perception* is very important - and it seems to be faster on Windoze...

 

jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×