Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I just upgraded to v12 for the speed improvements.

 

I started a grooming (matching) and I see the process is at 100% (1 hardware thread), when I have 8 in my MBP and nothing else is running.

 

This bottleneck has existed for as long as I can remember (I use Retrospect since the Cube).

 

It is time to make such tasks multicore, at least 4 hardware threads for Desktop.

 

BTW, I bought Desktop originally instead of Express because it supported tape, and I think it does not now (considering going back to LTO), and I only need to backup 1 or 2 computers.

 

Thanks

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Desktop version supports a single tape drive. The Single-Server version support a tape library with a single tape drive.

 

For most tasks, the bottleneck is i/o, not CPU.

 

I think that Retrospect uses one CPU core per execution unit. Since Desktop is limited to one execution unit, it uses one core.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see for many years now in the system monitor that it is limited to 1 hardware thread per activity.

 

I spend a lot of the time bottlenecked by this, so it is worth optimising (at least in matching, where I was seeing it now). I basically have no use for multiple concurrent activities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×