Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
rschreiber

Grooming Performance

Recommended Posts

I think Grooming on Disk would be much faster if the segments where smaller. Currently segments are about 600MB and if grooming wants to clear out a 10K file then it seems to read 600.000MB and write 599.990MB. Why not make the segments about 1/10th the size? I would rather have many more segments that are smaller.

 

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×