Jump to content

sdw999

Members
  • Content count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About sdw999

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. I totally agree - not a Retrospect problem. I did have a second SSD in place of the SuperDrive (so a non-standard spec) - I've now put the SuperDrive back in. Just tried copying the 35k files in finder - all good - sustained 50+ MB/s to a FW800 HDD with a 5400rpm drive. I'll test the backup s/w again - I/O delays could have been caused by non-standard parts.
  2. Thanks for the prompt replies Lennart. The source disk read issue is not limited to Retrospect. It also happens for two other backup/duplication products that I'm trailing, namely Time Machine and Memeo. I've tried HFS+ and NTFS (via Paragon driver) as targets, but both have the same issue. So it must be source disk/file-system or O/S related. I've tried two different internal SSD source disks - same problem. Anyone have any ideas why MacOSX would behave this way? Does anyone else see this? If not - then I assume something else that I have installed must be causing it - but I'm new to MacOSX and I don't know where to look. I've never seen anything like this before on any O/S (OpenVMS, Solaris, linux, WinAll), or backup/duplication/cloning software, i.e. where software is able to read source disk fine for 2 to 10 minutes and stream to the target disk, and then nothing, it all goes quiet for 2 to 10 minutes. Most odd. The read/write duration and the delay duration both vary randomly from anything from 2 minutes to 10 minutes. If I run any of several disk exercisers - these run fine on both source and target - but then these work on just one file. It's almost as if the file system has a problem processing a large amount of file reads - or OSX is detecting a large amount of file system reads and stepping in and pausing.
  3. In the past I have regularly used Ghost 15 to perform a VSS snapshot backup of 360 GB (from a 500 GB SSD) on a running Windows XP laptop (i.e. not booted in to the product, just normal WinXP) to an eSATA external 2.5" 7200rpm 500 GB HDD, and it would always completely fill the eSATA rev.1 channel at 150 MB/s, to backup that 360 GB in 41 minutes. So I was kind of hoping that Retrospect 9 would at least be able to sequentially fill the USB 2 bus to a 5400 rpm HDD. I'm not moaning, just curious about the stutter and lack of sequential streaming. If that's how it works, then so be it. I have about 50k files on the internal Mac drive that I'm testing.
  4. Hi Forum, I'm running my first test backup. My MBPro laptop is both server and client - i.e. a standalone machine. No tape. I'm testing a backup from internal SSD to a USB HDD and activity monitor clearly shows regular gaps/pauses/stutter where no I/O is occurring. Is there a performance setting that I can change to tell Retrospect to just run as quickly as possible, and not to continually pause? I have tested the drive, it is capable of sustained multi-gigabyte 30 MB/s sequential read and also same for writes. Thanks, Dave.
  5. Hi Team, Has this app been removed? Are there any plans to update and re-publish? Thanks, Dave.
×