Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About rxlaw

  • Rank
  1. rxlaw

    "Normal" backup backs up too much

    Welcome to the fun and unpredictable world of Retrospect's incremental logic. But it is a major PIA due to the time to do that first backup (all files), and more importantly, it starts appending to your existing backup set, essentially doubling the media requirements. I've had this happen twice, with each version update. For some reason, Retrospect seems to not recognize the previous snapshots and which files have not changed. Never got a good explanation, but if it happens once every couple of years, I guess it's tolerable. Bob.
  2. rxlaw

    Red box with numbers?

    Hi Bill, I'd suggest you start another thread with this, or find one that's focused on the DR disc. I created mine, but have not tested it. I could never get DR to work on my old PC with 7.6; although the system appeared to be rebuilt from the restore procedure, logging into Windows produced an immediate shutdown. I finally had to reinstall Win XP from scratch and reinstall all programs, only trusting Retrospect 7.6 to recover data files. Given other anomalies with 7.7, it's probably a good idea to do a DR "drill" to test whether the system can truly be restored with Retrospect. And that means testing all user accounts on the restored box. Bob.
  3. rxlaw

    A Power Failure Corrupts Retrospect???

    Understood, but the power failure occurred hours away from any active backup processes. My UPS does signal the system for a clean shutdown, and having witnessed the process it's essentially like a user shutting down from the desktop. There is no rational reason that this should corrupt IDLING critical backup software to the point it's inoperable upon restoration of power.
  4. rxlaw

    A Power Failure Corrupts Retrospect???

    Yes, all is well now. But static licensing data should NOT be in a "config.dat" file that is constantly open and written to by Retrospect, especially because lack of the licensing information completely cripples subsequent critical backups. EMC/Iomega: Ever heard of registry entries? Or separate files for scripts and configuration data? :devil:
  5. rxlaw

    A Power Failure Corrupts Retrospect???

    Just an update. The backup script was that from December, which didn't contain the volume selections I had been backing up till this corruption. Fortunately, adding additional volumes and system state settings to the script did not cause the subsequent backup (after recovery of the license) to ignore existing snapshots in the backup set. (When upgrading from 7.6 to 7.7, 7.7 seemed to ignore already backed up files from 7.6, resulting in three days work to re-create a new backup set while retaining the 7.6 snapshots.) So while the issue is not as serious as my first post on this topic indicates, the question remains: why is 7.7 subject to this corruption when previous versions never exhibited this problem?
  6. rxlaw

    Red box with numbers?

    It means replies or posts that you haven't seen yet.
  7. Awoke to Retrospect 7.7 claiming my copy isn't licensed. Had to go through customer support to get a working license code (the one from the purchase date failed and the website claimed it was already used). So I got the license taken care of, and guess what? Retrospect's history thinks I haven't backed up since 12/13. Because Retrospect has gone into this brain dead mode, any backups to existing sets (obviously, they have data written since 12/13) will get ignored and Retrospect will try to do a complete backup from scratch. This will exceed my target drive's capacity and will result in me spending the next two days copying backup sets manually to alternative media, and essentially having to endure a 24 hour full backup cycle. This is unacceptable. Shouldn't backup software be the LAST thing that shats itself with something as common as a power failure? This NEVER happened in 3 years with previous versions. Not a happy camper.
  8. rxlaw

    "Cannot connect to Retrospect"

    Additional fun fact. The last backup Retrospect ran was on 1/1. Since then, nada. Edit: Rebooting resolved the problem. However, there is no indication in System or Application logs as to why Retrospect just died on 1/1 (machine was unattended till 1/3). Gee, it's good I don't rely on this software to protect my data. smirk on>
  9. Oh lovely. Now, when attempting to start Retrospect from the desktop icon or start menu, I get a dialog from the Retrospect monitor that says "Cannot connect to Retrospect." Strangely, directly invoking retrospect.exe from the Program Files folder does the same thing. These problems are really starting to get irksome, as Retrospect was pretty darn stable till this version. :angryred:
  10. rxlaw

    Need *.inf driver file for my network card

    There are a lot of files in those directories that are locked and would not copy cleanly to the DVD. As long as you copy the system32 files (the ones that aren't locked) to a temporary directory location and just use it to pull drivers, you'd be safe. Trying to directly plunk that into a (what will be live) destination \WINDOWS directory doesn't sound like a good idea.
  11. Robin, Thank you. Unfortunately, Retrospect did not offer to update itself. I found the update patch file on the website and manually applied it. The error doesn't appear in the logs anymore. Can you tell us if that memory problem caused any untoward effects on the integrity of the backups? Bob.
  12. What the heck is this error that shows up in the log for backups? Every time. And where is the procedure for the update ("Patch") that I've seen others post about here? 7.7, two "lucky numbers," have been anything but with respect to Retrospect. :angry2:
  13. rxlaw

    7.7 Using 7.6 Backup Set

    Thanks, Robin. But it would sure be nice if this was documented. I have spent two days untangling my backup media as a result of this. Essentially, it orphans the existing backup set on the media.
  14. rxlaw

    7.7 Using 7.6 Backup Set

    Gee, this is special. Ran my first backup with 7.7, using the same script and backup set that I've been using since 7.6. For some reason, it's looking like Retrospect thinks this is the FIRST backup, and it's doing a full backup against all my 175GB. Totally ignoring files that have ALREADY been backed up in the set. Needless to say, backing up to a firewire drive, this is taking 12 hours. EMC/Danz/Iomega needs to make it very clear that previous versions' backup sets will NOT be respected, and provide a workaround to this untenable situation. I seem to recall this happening in 7.5 to 7.6 upgrades, and it looks like I'll lose all my previous sessions and snapshots (once the currently running backup runs out of room on the target drive), or I'll be lucky and just have Restrospect vomit and ask for another backup destination. I guess I have to get a whole new drive to start again in order to preserve my 7.6 sets. Has anyone else seen this issue?
  15. rxlaw

    Windows 7 client support

    So we are now "at the time of release" of Windows 7. When can we expect an announcement (at least) from EMC? Thanks!